000 | 03059nam a2200265 i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | CHED | ||
005 | 20250219104049.0 | ||
007 | ta | ||
008 | 250213e2018 ph ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 | _cCommission on Higher Education | ||
100 | 1 | _aCondez, Maria Cristina | |
245 | 0 | 0 |
_aEfficiency and productivity of SUCs in the Philippines _c / Maria Cristina Condez |
260 | 3 |
_aMintal, Davao City _b : University of Southeastern Philippines _c,2024. |
|
300 |
_axi,[170 leaves] _c; 27 x 21cm. |
||
500 | _aDissertation (Doctor of Philosophy major in Development Administration) -- University of Southeastern Philippines, June 2024. | ||
520 | 3 | _a The study employs Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and the Malmquist Index to evaluate the efficiency and productivity of 101 State Universities and Colleges (SUCs) in the Philippines. Using panel data spanning 2017 to 2021, the research adopts both Constant Returns to Scale (CRS) and Variable Returns to Scale (VRS) models. It examines two inputs-faculty] numbers and financial resources (personnel services, Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses or MOOE, and capital outlay)-and assesses two outputs-the total number of student enrollments and graduates. Results indicate that among the 101 SUCs, only 8 are considered efficient under the CRS model, while 11 are efficient under the VRS model. This discrepancy arises from the differing methodologies, with CRS generally yielding lower efficiency scores and VRS higher ones. Technical efficiency (TE) exhibits significant variability, with average scores ranging from 50% to 63%, and most SUCs operating at approximately 83% of their optimal scale. Similarly, allocative efficiency (AE) varies, with mean AE ratios of 0.4019 under CRS and 0.4836 under VRS, indicating that resources are allocated at only 40% to 48% of optimal efficiency. The study also finds modest productivity improvements, primarily driven by technological advancements, though with considerable variation among SUCs. It underscores the importance of strategic interventions to address inefficiencies, optimize resource allocation, and enhance educational quality. These interventions should focus on transparent resource allocation, administrator skill development, and robust quality assurance systems. Furthermore, the study suggests future research should concentrate on longitudinal studies to monitor progress and assess the impacts of interventions on SUC efficiency and effectiveness. | |
650 | 1 | 0 |
_aState Universities and Colleges _zPhilippines |
650 | 2 | 0 |
_aHigher Education _zPhilippines |
650 | 2 | 0 |
_aEducational Productivity _zPhilippines |
650 | 2 | 0 |
_aEducational Evaluation _zPhilippines |
650 | 2 | 0 |
_aEfficiency in Education _zPhilippines |
856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttp://181.215.242.151/cgi-bin/koha/opac-retrieve-file.pl?id=9efcc89e8209c5e4030a887ea35c3a6f _zAbstract |
856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttp://181.215.242.151/cgi-bin/koha/opac-retrieve-file.pl?id=139c7a56afe38bde50d112d3ee8d2201 _zTable of Contents |
942 |
_2lcc _n0 _cCHEDFR |
||
999 |
_c7367 _d7367 |