Local cover image
Local cover image

Efficiency and productivity of SUCs in the Philippines / Maria Cristina Condez

By: Material type: TextTextPublication details: Mintal, Davao City : University of Southeastern Philippines ,2024.Description: xi,[170 leaves] ; 27 x 21cmSubject(s): Online resources: Abstract: The study employs Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and the Malmquist Index to evaluate the efficiency and productivity of 101 State Universities and Colleges (SUCs) in the Philippines. Using panel data spanning 2017 to 2021, the research adopts both Constant Returns to Scale (CRS) and Variable Returns to Scale (VRS) models. It examines two inputs-faculty] numbers and financial resources (personnel services, Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses or MOOE, and capital outlay)-and assesses two outputs-the total number of student enrollments and graduates. Results indicate that among the 101 SUCs, only 8 are considered efficient under the CRS model, while 11 are efficient under the VRS model. This discrepancy arises from the differing methodologies, with CRS generally yielding lower efficiency scores and VRS higher ones. Technical efficiency (TE) exhibits significant variability, with average scores ranging from 50% to 63%, and most SUCs operating at approximately 83% of their optimal scale. Similarly, allocative efficiency (AE) varies, with mean AE ratios of 0.4019 under CRS and 0.4836 under VRS, indicating that resources are allocated at only 40% to 48% of optimal efficiency. The study also finds modest productivity improvements, primarily driven by technological advancements, though with considerable variation among SUCs. It underscores the importance of strategic interventions to address inefficiencies, optimize resource allocation, and enhance educational quality. These interventions should focus on transparent resource allocation, administrator skill development, and robust quality assurance systems. Furthermore, the study suggests future research should concentrate on longitudinal studies to monitor progress and assess the impacts of interventions on SUC efficiency and effectiveness.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
CHED Funded Research CHED Funded Research Commission on Higher Education Theses and Dissertations Thesis and Dissertation LG 996 2024 C6 C66 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available (Restricted Access) CHEDFR-000318
Digital Thesis and Dissertations Digital Thesis and Dissertations Commission on Higher Education Digital Thesis and Dissertation Digital Thesis and Dissertation LG 996 2024 C6 C66 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available (Room Use Only) DCHEDFR-000075

Dissertation (Doctor of Philosophy major in Development Administration) -- University of Southeastern Philippines, June 2024.

The study employs Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and the
Malmquist Index to evaluate the efficiency and productivity of 101 State
Universities and Colleges (SUCs) in the Philippines. Using panel data
spanning 2017 to 2021, the research adopts both Constant Returns to
Scale (CRS) and Variable Returns to Scale (VRS) models. It examines two
inputs-faculty] numbers and financial resources (personnel services,
Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses or MOOE, and capital
outlay)-and assesses two outputs-the total number of student
enrollments and graduates. Results indicate that among the 101 SUCs,
only 8 are considered efficient under the CRS model, while 11 are efficient
under the VRS model. This discrepancy arises from the differing
methodologies, with CRS generally yielding lower efficiency scores and
VRS higher ones. Technical efficiency (TE) exhibits significant variability,
with average scores ranging from 50% to 63%, and most SUCs operating
at approximately 83% of their optimal scale. Similarly, allocative efficiency
(AE) varies, with mean AE ratios of 0.4019 under CRS and 0.4836 under
VRS, indicating that resources are allocated at only 40% to 48% of optimal efficiency. The study also finds modest productivity improvements,
primarily driven by technological advancements, though with considerable
variation among SUCs. It underscores the importance of strategic
interventions to address inefficiencies, optimize resource allocation, and
enhance educational quality. These interventions should focus on
transparent resource allocation, administrator skill development, and
robust quality assurance systems. Furthermore, the study suggests future
research should concentrate on longitudinal studies to monitor progress
and assess the impacts of interventions on SUC efficiency and
effectiveness.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image
Commission on Higher Education Library
Higher Education Development Center Building
C.P. Garcia Ave.,Diliman,Quezon City,Philippines
© 2025

Flag Counter 

Powered by Koha