Local cover image
Local cover image

Comparative study of six alternative solutions for embalming dogs for gross dissection and as fixatives for histological studies / Jojo D. Cauilan

By: Material type: TextTextPublication details: Los BaƱos, Laguna : University of the Philippines Los BaƱos ,2018. Description: xvi, 121 pages 27 x 21 cmSubject(s): Online resources: Abstract: This study was conducted to compare the efficiency of six alternative fixative solutions with formalin fixation of dog specimen for gross and histological studies. thirty-five non-descript dogs with the body condition score range of 3-5 out of 1-9 were used and euthanized via the common carotid artery. They were divided into seven treatment groups with five animals per treatment by stratified sampling. Animals in each treatment group were embalmed with formaldehyde (Tl), Soap Ethanol-based Fixing Solution (T2), Weigner's Solution (T3), modified SEFS 1 (T4), modified SEFS 2 (T5), modified Weigner's Solution 1 (T6) and modified Weigner's Solution 2 (T7). Color, texture, haptic property and conjunctival irritation scoring was done once a month for five months. Bacterial and fungal isolation was conducted to determine the presence of microbes. One non-descript dog was used for histological study and tissue samples were collected, fixed with the six alternative solutions and formalin solution, then subjected to routine paraffin technique at 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours post-fixation. Results revealed that dog specimen fixed with solution from Treatment 6 presented a life-like color and consistencies which are very important in studying gross anatomy. However, histological studies revealed that alternative fixing solutions were less effective with formalin fixation. Fungal and bacterial identification revealed the presence of microbes while no fungal growths were observed. Cost analysis showed that formalin solution remains the cheapest of the solutions. In conclusion, Treatment 6 can be used as an alternative fixative for gross anatomical studies considering the factors in selection of the type of fixative required for dissection. Histologically, formalin solution was still the best solution for tissue fixation although alternative fixative solutions presented in the study can be used but only for a limited time period of24 hours.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
CHED Funded Research CHED Funded Research Commission on Higher Education Thesis and Dissertation LG 995 2018 C6 C38 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available CHEDFR-000331
CHED Funded Research CHED Funded Research Commission on Higher Education Digital Thesis and Dissertation Digital Thesis and Dissertation LG 995 2018 C6 C38 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available DCHEDFR-000077

Thesis (Master of Science in Veterinary Medicine) -- University of the Philippines Los BaƱos,May2018.

This study was conducted to compare the efficiency of six alternative fixative
solutions with formalin fixation of dog specimen for gross and histological studies.
thirty-five non-descript dogs with the body condition score range of 3-5 out of 1-9
were used and euthanized via the common carotid artery. They were divided into seven
treatment groups with five animals per treatment by stratified sampling. Animals in each
treatment group were embalmed with formaldehyde (Tl), Soap Ethanol-based Fixing
Solution (T2), Weigner's Solution (T3), modified SEFS 1 (T4), modified SEFS 2 (T5),
modified Weigner's Solution 1 (T6) and modified Weigner's Solution 2 (T7). Color,
texture, haptic property and conjunctival irritation scoring was done once a month for five
months.

Bacterial and fungal isolation was conducted to determine the presence of
microbes. One non-descript dog was used for histological study and tissue samples were
collected, fixed with the six alternative solutions and formalin solution, then subjected to
routine paraffin technique at 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours post-fixation.
Results revealed that dog specimen fixed with solution from Treatment 6 presented
a life-like color and consistencies which are very important in studying gross anatomy.

However, histological studies revealed that alternative fixing solutions were less effective
with formalin fixation. Fungal and bacterial identification revealed the presence of
microbes while no fungal growths were observed. Cost analysis showed that formalin
solution remains the cheapest of the solutions.
In conclusion, Treatment 6 can be used as an alternative fixative for gross
anatomical studies considering the factors in selection of the type of fixative required for
dissection. Histologically, formalin solution was still the best solution for tissue fixation
although alternative fixative solutions presented in the study can be used but only for a
limited time period of24 hours.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image
Commission on Higher Education Library
Higher Education Development Center Building
C.P. Garcia Ave.,Diliman,Quezon City,Philippines
© 2025

Flag Counter 

Powered by Koha